Mikaela Erskog
“I shall speak about women's writing: about what it will do.
Woman must write her self: must write about women and bring women to writing,
from which they have been driven away as violently as from their bodies-for the
same reasons, by the same law, with the same fatal goal. Woman must put herself
into the text-as into the world and into history-by her own movement.” -
Hélène Cixous, (1976)
Frantz Fanon: Conflicts and Feminisms by T.
Denean Sharpley-Whiting is a feminist critique of feminist critiques of Frantz
Fanon’s corpus of work. By evaluating how various feminist critics and their
theoretical frameworks interpreted Fanon’s work, Sharpley-Whiting aims to
strengthen feminist thought by revealing the limits of certain arguments and
the potential strength of others.
I would argue that Sharpley-Whiting’s text places itself within
the lineage of critical humanism as she, much like Fanon, does the important
task of “questioning of the questioning of [humankind]” (Gordon, 1995: 10). In
doing so, I believe Sharpley-Whiting acts in good faith to feminist thought, as
she reveals the shortcomings of certain feminist critiques that tend to conceal
themselves in order to develop a critical feminist approach that can facilitate
the application of feminist values of the liberation, inclusion,
self-creativity of women and oppressed humanity.