This
article revisits the notion of radical planning from the standpoint
of the global South. Emerging struggles for citizenship in the global
South, seasoned by the complexities of state–citizen relations within
colonial and post-colonial regimes, offer an historicized view indispensable
to counter-hegemonic planning practices. The article articulates the
notion of insurgent planning as radical planning practices that respond
to neoliberal specifics of dominance through inclusion – that is, inclusive
governance. It characterizes the guiding principles for insurgent planning
practices as counter-hegemonic, transgressive and imaginative. The
article contributes to two current conversations within planning scholarship:
on the implication of grassroots insurgent citizenship for planning,
and on (de)colonization of planning theory.
Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South
by Farnak Miraftab, Planning Theory, 2009
Friday, 25 November 2011
A Progressive Policy without Progressive Politics: Lessons from the failure to implement ‘Breaking New Ground'
by Richard Pithouse, Journal of Town & Regional Planning, 2009
This article provides a brief overview of post-apartheid housing policy. It argues that, in principle, ‘Breaking New Ground’ (BNG) was a major advance over the subsidy system but that the failure to implement BNG, which has now been followed by more formal moves away from a rights based and towards a security based approach, lie in the failure to take a properly political approach to the urban crisis. It is suggested that a technocratic approach privileges elite interests and that there could be better results from an explicitly pro-poor political approach – which would include direct support for poor people’s organisations to challenge elite interests, including those in the state, and to undertake independent innovation on their own.
This article provides a brief overview of post-apartheid housing policy. It argues that, in principle, ‘Breaking New Ground’ (BNG) was a major advance over the subsidy system but that the failure to implement BNG, which has now been followed by more formal moves away from a rights based and towards a security based approach, lie in the failure to take a properly political approach to the urban crisis. It is suggested that a technocratic approach privileges elite interests and that there could be better results from an explicitly pro-poor political approach – which would include direct support for poor people’s organisations to challenge elite interests, including those in the state, and to undertake independent innovation on their own.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)