by Ntombizikhona Valela
Alice Cherki's Frantz Fanon: A Portrait is a
biography on Frantz Fanon that focusses on his work as a psychiatrist, his
writing and his activism, and contribution to Algeria's independence. It also
documents Fanon's interest in Africa's independence and Africa's future going
forward.
This biography started off as quite challenging for me
because it is a departure from the conventional structure of biographies I have
read such as Xolela Mangcu's Biko: A Biography and Winnie Mandela: A
life by Anné Marié du Preez Bezdrop. Such biographies tend to go deep into
the personal life of the subject while Cherki's biography does not focus on
this with Cherki explaining that Fanon was a deeply private man. What I enjoy
about biographies is their ability to break down the larger-than-life image
that is associated with the subject of the biography to show a more human and
thus relatable character. This is something that I find ironic about this book
because Fanon's work was devoted to humanizing the oppressed people of the
colonized world, while not much about his personal life is revealed. On the other
side of the coin, though, I find that his concern for the colonized brought out
his humaneness. As I was reading this and comparing the biographies I have read
while also reflecting on the death of Nelson Mandela and the documentaries that
were broadcast on television during the days leading to his funeral, I found
that Alice Cherki writes so simply about Fanon revealing how ordinary he was.
The reason this struck me so much was because biographies of people like Winnie
Madikizela-Mandela, Steve Biko and Nelson Mandela create this idea that in
order to achieve something great or to be regarded as a revolutionary one ought
to be extraordinary from birth. For example Winnie Mandela: A life opens
with a tracing of Madikizela-Mandela's ancestry to the Mpondo royal family;
Mandela is known to be born out of Thembu royalty. There's this idea that is
created (whether deliberately or not, I do not know) that it takes some sort of
anointing to make history and I think this closes the space for participation
in revolution. However what I find in Cherki's book is that Fanon was an
ordinary man born from an ordinary family, yet became one of the greatest
thinkers of his generation. For me this book, in a way (whether intentional or
not) acted as a response to the way some biographers write and thus create the
impression that revolution, political thought and activism is reserved for the
chosen few.