Showing posts with label Stuart Hall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stuart Hall. Show all posts
Monday, 17 March 2014
Monday, 24 February 2014
Ode to an Arsenal Fan
Grant Farred, The Con
It was a portentous 10 days. Between February 1 and 10 2014,
a strong sense of foreboding haunted me.
For the past several years I have communicated with Stuart
Hall at least three times a year. I would email him once on his on his
birthday, February 3, and twice a football season. Stuart was an Arsenal fan
and I am a partisan of God’s Own Team. He told me that he watched Arsenal with
his grandsons. My grandfather, I told him, had been an Arsenal fan; at least he
wouldn’t be overseeing a divided house.
Saturday, 22 February 2014
The Failure of Partial Displacement: In Honour of Stuart Hall
Grant Farred, The Con
“Three months at Oxford persuaded me that it was not my
home,” he told the Guardian in 2012. “I’m not English and I never will be. The
life I have lived is one of partial displacement. I came to England as a means
of escape, and it was a failure.”
There are few events that demand our thinking as much as
death. It is difficult enough to find the right words with which to remember
the one who has passed; to remember exactly what it is that mattered in the
moment of that passing, a moment unavoidably fraught and overwrought with loss,
recollection, pain and immense gratitude for the life that was. Producing a
language that befits the dead, who are still so alive to us, is a task made
inordinately more difficult when the one who is being honoured is an
intellectual who made the political use of language his life’s work. When the
intellectual in question, as is the case here, gave theoretical gravity to
“articulation”, renovated Marxism for our time, made us think about how
“encoding” and “decoding” constituted a critical part of our everyday
existence, and, perhaps his greatest accomplishment, made us attend to
“culture” as though it were an entirely new concept.
Wednesday, 19 February 2014
Monday, 17 February 2014
Could you name a British black intellectual, now Stuart Hall has gone?
As a pioneer of cultural studies and coiner of the term
"Thatcherism", Prof Stuart Hall, who died this week, was in the
truest sense a public intellectual. He was also something else: probably the
only black British intellectual who most people could readily name.
A bit of prompting might produce mention of Paul Gilroy of
King's College, author of The Empire Strikes Back and Black Atlantic, who has
recently returned to Britain after several years in America's more fertile
ebony towers. But how many other black British thinkers have a public profile?
Thursday, 13 February 2014
Stuart Hall was a voice for misfits everywhere. That's his real legacy
There are people whose reach and generosity is only fully
understood when they go. Stuart Hall was such a man. He was the reason I did
cultural studies and went to work at Marxism Today in the 80s. I hardly knew
him, but I knew his work well and it was never just "writing" to me.
Hall's words were political interventions that changed the terms of the debate
– about what Thatcherism meant and how it could be opposed; about race; about
class; about culture. This sounds complicated, but to see him speak was to be
overwhelmed by his charisma, his eloquence, his desire to include everybody in
the room, his sheer moral force.
"My God!" I remember saying. "This man should
be in charge of the universe." But then he would sit next to you in some
godforsaken canteen at some conference and ask you about your kids.
Wednesday, 12 February 2014
Stuart Hall: a class warrior and a class act
![]() |
| Stuart Hall |
At a Race Matters conference in 1994 the great and good of
black America's cognoscenti gathered at Princeton University to mark Cornel
West's departure to Harvard. Among them were Nobel laureate Toni Morrison, the
late Manning Marable, Patricia Williams and Angela Davis. When questions were
invited following the opening panel the first speaker came to the mic.
"Stuart Hall, the Open University," he said, by way of introduction.
"The room exploded into applause," wrote Claire Alexander in a
special edition of Cultural Studies in 2009. "It was the only time I have
ever witnessed someone getting a standing ovation for simply saying their
name."
Tuesday, 11 February 2014
In gratitude to Stuart Hall, a socialist intellectual who taught us to confront the political with a smile
Stuart Hall was the most important public intellectual of
the past 50 years. In an age where having a TV show allegedly makes someone a
public intellectual and where the status of the university you work at counts
for more than what you have to say, Hall’s work seems even more urgent and his
passing, somehow, even sadder.
But for Hall I wouldn’t have become an academic. There was
no space for someone like me before Hall. Discovering the field of Cultural
Studies as an undergraduate, I found validation and recognition. Suddenly, my
background and way of life as a working-class black kid mattered and was
important beyond the confines of south London. It’s taken for granted now that
culture matters, that popular culture is a site of politics, that politics
saturates everyday life, and that these things can and should be studied in a
serious manner. But despite their claims, it was not Sociology, or History, or
Economics, or even Anthropology that created this space. It was Cultural
Studies. Most intellectuals are known for contributing to our knowledge on a
particular topic or specific theme. Hall was different. He created an entire
new academic discipline, and then mentored just about every significant scholar
that came through Cultural Studies in the 1970s and 80s.
Stuart Hall's message to those who want change: think, debate – and get off your backside
It is the way our sympathy flows and recoils that really
determines our lives. This opening sentence from Stuart Hall's 1960 review of
Lady Chatterley's Lover belongs to DH Lawrence. The critic had unearthed it
from deep inside the novel. It could serve as an epitaph for Stuart himself.
His own sympathies and aversions played a huge part in determining his
political makeup. It is not easy to sum up what he leaves behind in a few
words. Soon, one hopes, that the conversation his colleague and friend, Bill
Schwartz had been conducting with him over several years will be edited and
published in book form.
Thursday, 16 January 2014
Friday, 29 November 2013
David Scott interviewed by Stuart Hall
Bomb Magazine, 2005
Stuart Hall David, your book Conscripts of Modernity: The
Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment is written in the shadow of what you call the
exhaustion and collapse of “the social and political hopes that went into the
anti-colonial imaginary and postcolonial making of national sovereignties.”
What do you think went wrong, fundamentally, with that project?
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
Monday, 18 July 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



