Showing posts with label Kirk Helliker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirk Helliker. Show all posts
Friday, 7 August 2015
Saturday, 20 July 2013
Christopher Merrett reviews 'The Promise of Land'
by Christopher Merrett, The Witness
A STRUGGLE for land has been central to the history of South
Africa, complicated by the fact that to the protagonists it represented very
different world views.
The recent centenary of the Natives’ Land Act was a reminder
that land was a cornerstone of white domination, a reason why Fred Hendricks
argues in The Promise of Land that its reform is a “barrier to a unitary
imagination of the South Africa nation”.
Instead, a revolution is required to complete the process of
decolonisation and creation of a national identity. Twenty years after
liberation, democracy, social justice and the symbolism of restitution should
have made the country look very different, he suggests.
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
Marxisms past and present
Kirk Helliker, Rhodes University, South Africa
Peter Vale, University
of Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Marxism was central to the understanding of South Africa’s
struggle for freedom. This article provides a critical analysis of Marxist
literature on South Africa since the 1970s, drawing out its relevance for
contemporary analyses of the post-apartheid state and for radical politics
today. It suggests that while the literature offered important insights into
the character of the apartheid state, it failed to provide a critical appraisal
of the state per se. Moreover, the capturing of state power by the liberation
movement was not grounded in an understanding of the oppressive character of
the state-form. The undermining of mainstream Marxism under neo-liberalizing
conditions in post-apartheid South Africa has opened up the prospects for
anti-statist radical libertarian thinking (including autonomist Marxism), and
this thinking is consistent with the practices of certain autonomist popular
politics currently emerging. Social theorizing on South Africa has had a
complex relationship with Marxism. This article is interested in drawing on
this experience in an effort to understand its implications for the ‘new’ South
Africa where, 20 years after apartheid’s formal ending, social transformation
remains caught in the logic not of Marxism but neo-liberalizing capitalism.
Monday, 15 October 2012
Contemporary Social Theory 2010
Contemporary
Social Theory
Sociology
III
Department
of Sociology
Rhodes
University
Fourth Term
2012
This year there is a special Contemporary Social
Theory course to mark the visit to the Department of Sociology of Professor
John Holloway during the fourth term.
The course focuses
on specific theorists, as follows:
Week 1: Partha
Chatterjee (by K Helliker)
Weeks 2 & 3:
John Holloway
Week 4: Alain
Badiou (by Michael Neocosmos, UNISA)
Week 5: Samir Amin
(by T Alexander)
Week 6: Jacques
Ranciere (by R Pithouse, Politics Department).
Friday, 24 June 2011
Fanon’s Curse: Re-imagining Marxism in South Africa’s Age of Retreat
by Kirk Helliker & Peter Vale, Paper presented at XII Annual Conference of the International Association of Critical Realism Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 23rd-25th July 2009
Although increasingly hidden by the incarnation of capital and the national project, South Africa has a long and deep-seated association with Marxism. This intellectual project, including the critical moments in its rise and demise, is the central focus of this article. The argument is simple, almost linear: South Africa’s interest in Marxism – especially Western Marxism – was abruptly truncated. There has been an unravelling of interest in Marxism since the end of apartheid: this we regard as a retreat. The generalised condition of retreat has stunted the possibility of an engagement with building a socialist alternative that once appeared to be ingrained in the struggles which raged during apartheid’s endgame.
Although increasingly hidden by the incarnation of capital and the national project, South Africa has a long and deep-seated association with Marxism. This intellectual project, including the critical moments in its rise and demise, is the central focus of this article. The argument is simple, almost linear: South Africa’s interest in Marxism – especially Western Marxism – was abruptly truncated. There has been an unravelling of interest in Marxism since the end of apartheid: this we regard as a retreat. The generalised condition of retreat has stunted the possibility of an engagement with building a socialist alternative that once appeared to be ingrained in the struggles which raged during apartheid’s endgame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)