Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marxism. Show all posts
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
Monday, 27 July 2015
Wednesday, 3 December 2014
'The New Radicals: A Generational Memoir of the 1970s' - A review
Glen Moss, The New Radicals: A Generational Memoir of the
1970s, Jacana, Johannesburg, 2014
Reviewed by: Benjamin Fogel, Journal of Asian & African Studies
The New Radicals is a generational memoir, or rather a
political memoir of a generation of white South African student radicals that came of age in the early
1970s through the National Union of South African Students (NUSAS). This generation formed a key
part of the emerging movements that awakened South Africa from the political slumber of the
1960s. As Glenn Moss puts it, his book “records how they (a group of students) moved from the
relatively liberal protest and symbolic politics of an elite university to help in creating the
preconditions for a radical challenge to the society that had formed them” (p.vii).
Wednesday, 19 November 2014
Charles Mills Interviewed by George Yancy
George Yancy: You are a philosopher who thinks very deeply
about issues of race. Can you provide a sense of your work?
Charles Mills: I think a simple way to sum it up would be as
the transition from white Marxism to (what I have recently started calling)
black radical liberalism.
G.Y.: So, how does “white” modify Marxism? And what is it
about the modification that helps to account for the transition to what you’re
now calling black radical liberalism?
Thursday, 11 September 2014
We are the authors and actors of our own history
By Laurence Cox and Alf Gunvald Nilsen, ROAR Magazine
Neoliberalism is in crisis. Some of the
elements of this are fairly obvious: the financial crisis of recent years and
elites’ inability to chart an effective strategy for long-term profitability;
the decline of US geopolitical hegemony, most visibly in its one-time backyard
of Latin America and the strategically central Middle East and North African
region; a legitimacy crisis around surveillance and military intervention more
broadly; severe problems with making the WTO, FTAA and other such arrangements actually
produce the intended results; the EU’s increasing inability to secure mandates
for austerity in referenda or elections; not to mention the medium-term threats
to fixed assets (and supporters) caused by climate change.
Monday, 7 April 2014
Prospects for a Happy but Contested Future: The Promise of Revolutionary Humanism
by David Harvey, The White Review
From time immemorial there have been human beings who have
believed that they could construct, individually or collectively, a better
world for themselves than that which they had inherited. Quite a lot of them
also came to believe that in the course of so doing it might be possible to
remake themselves as different if not better people. I count myself among those
who believe in both these propositions. In Rebel Cities, for example, I argued
that ‘the question of what kind of city we want cannot be divorced from the
question of what kind of people we want to be, what kinds of social relations
we seek, what relations to nature we cherish, what style of life we desire,
what aesthetic values we hold’. The right to the city, I wrote, is ‘far more
than a right of individual or group access to the resources that the city
embodies: it is a right to change and re-invent the city more after our heart’s
desire … The freedom to make and remake ourselves and our cities is … one of
the most precious yet most neglected of our human rights.’[1] Perhaps for this
intuitive reason, the city has been the focus throughout its history of an
immense outpouring of utopian desires for happier futures and less alienating
times.
Monday, 21 October 2013
A Path Through the Embers and into the Agora?
A Path
Through the Embers and into the Agora?
- Notes on
the Necessity for our Democratic Imagination to Take Better Measure of the
World
Richard Pithouse
Richard Pithouse
Retrieving
life and the human from waste
Achille Mbembe has argued that the rendering
of human beings as waste by the interface of racism and capitalism in South
Africa means that “for the democratic project to have any future at all, it
should necessarily take the form of a conscious attempt to retrieve life and 'the human' from a history of waste”.
He adds that “the concepts of 'the human', or of 'humanism', inherited from the
West will not suffice. We will have to take seriously the anthropological
embeddedness of such terms in long histories of "the human" as
waste.” Mbembe is not the first to want to hold on to the idea of the human in
the face of the systemic denial of the full and equal humanity of all people
and to insist that the idea of the human needs to be delinked from what
Aimé Césairecalled 'pseudo-humanism' – colonial particularities masquerading
as universal. Césaire aspired to “a true humanism . . . a humanism
made to the measure of the world”. Steve Biko envisioned a “true humanity”.
A Path Through the Embers and into the Agora?
A
Path Through the Embers and into the Agora?
-
Notes on the Necessity for our Democratic Imagination to Take Better Measure of
the World
Richard Pithouse
Achille Mbembe has argued that the rendering of human beings as waste
by the interface of racism and capitalism in South Africa means that “for the
democratic project to have any future at all, it should necessarily take the
form of a conscious attempt to retrieve
life and 'the human' from a history of waste”. He adds that “the concepts
of 'the human', or of 'humanism', inherited from the West will not suffice. We
will have to take seriously the anthropological embeddedness of such terms in
long histories of "the human" as waste.” Mbembe is not the first to
want to hold on to the idea of the human in the face of the systemic denial of
the full and equal humanity of all people but to insist that the idea of the
human needs to be delinked from what Aimé Césaire
called 'pseudo-humanism' – colonial particularities masquerading as universal. Césaire aspired to “a true humanism....a
humanism made to the measure of the world”. Steve Biko envisioned a “true
humanity”.
Friday, 20 September 2013
The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism
![]() |
| The Gramscian Moment |
Click here to download this book in pdf.
“The Gramscian Moment demonstrates the extent to which
Gramsci’s thought represents a singular synthesis of virtually the entire
tradition of Western political thought. This work succeeds in presenting
Gramsci as a 'living classic', an author central to our understanding of
modernity. Given its scope, richness and originality, I have no doubt that this
work will represent a milestone in Gramscian scholarship and an important
contribution to contemporary debates in political theory and philosophy.”
—Stathis Kouvelakis, Author of Philosophy and Revolution and
Co-editor of The Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
Friday, 19 April 2013
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
Marxisms past and present
Kirk Helliker, Rhodes University, South Africa
Peter Vale, University
of Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Marxism was central to the understanding of South Africa’s
struggle for freedom. This article provides a critical analysis of Marxist
literature on South Africa since the 1970s, drawing out its relevance for
contemporary analyses of the post-apartheid state and for radical politics
today. It suggests that while the literature offered important insights into
the character of the apartheid state, it failed to provide a critical appraisal
of the state per se. Moreover, the capturing of state power by the liberation
movement was not grounded in an understanding of the oppressive character of
the state-form. The undermining of mainstream Marxism under neo-liberalizing
conditions in post-apartheid South Africa has opened up the prospects for
anti-statist radical libertarian thinking (including autonomist Marxism), and
this thinking is consistent with the practices of certain autonomist popular
politics currently emerging. Social theorizing on South Africa has had a
complex relationship with Marxism. This article is interested in drawing on
this experience in an effort to understand its implications for the ‘new’ South
Africa where, 20 years after apartheid’s formal ending, social transformation
remains caught in the logic not of Marxism but neo-liberalizing capitalism.
Thursday, 24 January 2013
Saturday, 1 December 2012
When Marxism becomes a dogmatic abstraction rather than a critical praxis
Marxist theory… can
become a false consciousness if, instead of being used for the methodical
investigation of reality through theory and practice, it is misused as a
defence against that very reality… Those who wish to deprive Marxism of its
critical, subversive power and turn it into an affirmative doctrine, generally
dig in behind a series of stereotyped statements which, in their abstraction,
are as irrefutable as devoid of result.
-E.P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays (1978)
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
Facing Reality
Libcom
Writing in collaboration with Cornelius Castoriadis and Grace Lee, C.L.R. James examines the practical process of social revolution in the modern world.
Writing in collaboration with Cornelius Castoriadis and Grace Lee, C.L.R. James examines the practical process of social revolution in the modern world.
"Springing forth from the utopian flames of
self-emancipation kindled by the workers councils of the Hungarian Revolution,
this pivotal book offers a socialist indictment of the miserabilism of state
capitalism and calls for the ongoing rejection of both vanguardism and the
bureaucratic rationalism of state power." - Ron Sakolsky, author of
Creating Anarchy
In this celebrated "underground classic," also
known as "C. L. R. James's most anarchist book," the author of The
Black Jacobins, History of Pan-African Revolt and Beyond a Boundary examines the
practical process of social revolution in the modern world. Inspired by the
October 1956 Hungarian workers' revolution against Stalinist oppression, as
well as the U.S. workers' "wild-cat" strikes (against Capital and the
union bureaucracies), James and his co-authors looked ahead to the rise of new
mass emancipatory movements by African Americans as well as
anti-colonialist/anti-imperialist currents in Africa and Asia. Virtually alone
among the radical texts of the time, Facing Reality also rejected modern
society's mania for "conquering nature," and welcomed women's
struggles "for new relations between the sexes."
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
'Fanon & Violence': A lecture by Lewis Gordon
Click here to watch this video at the Histories of Violence project.
The Histories of Violence “Fanon & Violence” lecture is provided by Professor Lewis R. Gordon (Temple University, U.S.A.). At the time of filming, Professor Gordon was the Director of the Institute for the Study of Race and Social Thought. He was also Director of the Centre for Afro-Jewish Studies while a Laura H. Carnell Professor of Philosophy at Temple University and President of the Caribbean Philosophical Association. Professor Gordon has written many works in race theory, Africana philosophy, postcolonial phenomenology, philosophy of existence, social and political philosophy, film and literature, philosophy of education, philosophy of human sciences, and a variety of topics in the public interest. Before joining Temple, he taught at Brown University for eight years, during which the program in Afro-American Studies became the Department of Africana Studies under his leadership as chairperson. He also taught at Purdue University and Yale University, and he is Ongoing Visiting Professor of Government and Philosophy at the University of the West Indies at Mona, Jamaica. Professor Gordon has presented lectures internationally, and has been a recipient of numerous awards and distinguished fellowships.
The Histories of Violence “Fanon & Violence” lecture is provided by Professor Lewis R. Gordon (Temple University, U.S.A.). At the time of filming, Professor Gordon was the Director of the Institute for the Study of Race and Social Thought. He was also Director of the Centre for Afro-Jewish Studies while a Laura H. Carnell Professor of Philosophy at Temple University and President of the Caribbean Philosophical Association. Professor Gordon has written many works in race theory, Africana philosophy, postcolonial phenomenology, philosophy of existence, social and political philosophy, film and literature, philosophy of education, philosophy of human sciences, and a variety of topics in the public interest. Before joining Temple, he taught at Brown University for eight years, during which the program in Afro-American Studies became the Department of Africana Studies under his leadership as chairperson. He also taught at Purdue University and Yale University, and he is Ongoing Visiting Professor of Government and Philosophy at the University of the West Indies at Mona, Jamaica. Professor Gordon has presented lectures internationally, and has been a recipient of numerous awards and distinguished fellowships.
Thursday, 17 May 2012
The Speculative Left
by Bruno Bosteels, 2005
For Badiou, there emerges a speculative type of leftism whenever communismis disjoined, and nowadays supposedly set free, from the historicity intrinsic to the various stages of Marxism. The critique of speculative leftism in this sense is actually a constant throughout Badiou’s work. At the same time, though, a common objection among readers of this work holds that Badiou himself, by sovereignly divorcing the theoretical fidelity to an event fromany concrete genealogical inscription of the event, over the years increasingly would have painted himself into a similar corner as a dogmatic, absolutist, or even downright mystical thinker. According to this objection, Badiou himself would be yet another example of ‘‘left-wing communism’’ as the ‘‘infantile disorder’’ of Marxism, to use Lenin’s well-known words, even if we might have to turn these words around today, following the example set not so long ago by Gabriel and Daniel Cohn-Bendit, in terms of Marxism as the ‘‘senile disorder’’ of an eternally youthful and invariant ‘‘leftism.’’ Once we grasp the logic behind Badiou’s critique of speculative leftism, however, we will also be better equipped to address this objection, according to which he himself, if not earlier then evermore clearly so in recent years, falls prey to precisely such a leftist temptation of wanting to be a communist without also being a Marxist.
For Badiou, there emerges a speculative type of leftism whenever communismis disjoined, and nowadays supposedly set free, from the historicity intrinsic to the various stages of Marxism. The critique of speculative leftism in this sense is actually a constant throughout Badiou’s work. At the same time, though, a common objection among readers of this work holds that Badiou himself, by sovereignly divorcing the theoretical fidelity to an event fromany concrete genealogical inscription of the event, over the years increasingly would have painted himself into a similar corner as a dogmatic, absolutist, or even downright mystical thinker. According to this objection, Badiou himself would be yet another example of ‘‘left-wing communism’’ as the ‘‘infantile disorder’’ of Marxism, to use Lenin’s well-known words, even if we might have to turn these words around today, following the example set not so long ago by Gabriel and Daniel Cohn-Bendit, in terms of Marxism as the ‘‘senile disorder’’ of an eternally youthful and invariant ‘‘leftism.’’ Once we grasp the logic behind Badiou’s critique of speculative leftism, however, we will also be better equipped to address this objection, according to which he himself, if not earlier then evermore clearly so in recent years, falls prey to precisely such a leftist temptation of wanting to be a communist without also being a Marxist.
Thursday, 12 April 2012
Racism and the Political Economy of Domination
Charles W. Mills interviewed by Tom Mills, New Left Project
Charles W. Mills is John Evans Professor of Moral and Intellectual Philosophy at Northwestern University. He is the author of The Racial Contract
and has written extensively about racism and political theory. In an
interview with Tom Mills he discussed his views on race, liberalism,
capitalism and the potential for social change.
The concept of race as an objective category has long been discredited by anthropology and biology, yet the social sciences show that racial disadvantage persists. How do you understand the concept of race and racism?
The concept of race as an objective category has long been discredited by anthropology and biology, yet the social sciences show that racial disadvantage persists. How do you understand the concept of race and racism?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

