On Monday evening, not
long after the sun went down, a man with a gun stepped out of the dark and into
the everyday domestic routine in Thuli Ndlovu’s home in KwaNdengezi, Durban. He
shot Ndlovu seven times, and her neighbour’s teenage son twice. Ndlovu died on
the spot. Her neighbour’s son is in a critical condition.
Ndlovu was the
chairperson of the KwaNdengezi branch of Abahlali baseMjondolo. Like Nkululeko
Gwala, a member of the same organisation, who was assassinated in Cato Crest,
also in Durban, in June last year, she had been subject to serious intimidation
for some time and had told her family and comrades that she expected to die.
Abahlali baseMjondolo is
not alone in having to confront political assassination in this part of the
country. In August this year three members of the National Union of
Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) were assassinated in Isithebe, an hour’s
drive from Durban. In March last year Thembinkosi Qumbelo was assassinated in
Cato Crest. He was involved in the same struggle against corruption and for
land and housing, including a high profile land occupation, that cost Gwala his
life three months later.
But Qumbelo had joined
the ANC in 2011 and was engaged in contestation with the local party structures
from within the party. People have also
been assassinated as a result of conflicts within the ruling party as well as
rivalry between it and the Inkatha Freedom Party and the New Freedom Party.
A study by David Bruce
published in September last year found that there have been at least 450
political assassinations in South Africa since the end of apartheid, the bulk
of them in the province of KwaZulu-Natal. Bruce concluded that political assassination
has become “a sustained feature of political life in South Africa, particularly
in KwaZulu-Natal”.
People involved in
grassroots struggles are also at risk of being killed by the police. In
September last year an unarmed teenage girl, Nqobile Nzuza, was killed with a
shot to the back of her head by a police officer while participating in a
protest organised by Abahlali baseMjondolo in Cato Crest. At least forty three
people have been killed by the police during protests around the country during
the last ten years. This figure doesn’t include the thirty seven striking
miners killed by the police in August 2012.
Organised attacks
In Marikana it was shots
fired at striking miners from the local office of the National Union of
Mineworkers that began the violence that ended in the police massacre. In
Durban there have, since 2009, been a number of cases where members of the
ruling party have attacked people organised outside of the party. In some cases
there has been explicit sanction for this kind of violence from the party’s
leaders.
In 2009, when members of
Abahlali baseMjondolo were attacked by members of the ruling party in the
Kennedy Road shack settlement in Durban, Willies Mchunu, a Minister in the
Provincial Government, declared that the settlement had been liberated. Last
year some media attention was directed to the speech given by Sibongiseni
Dhlomo, chairperson of the ANC in Durban, which was understood in some quarters
as having given official sanction for the assassination of Nkululeko Gwala four
hours later.
But nothing was made of
the fact that Dhlomo also responded to militant protests against corruption and
eviction in the same area by urging what he called ‘the community’ that they
should not “rely on police, but be protective of this area”. In recent days
Abahlali baseMjondolo have reported that in both Cato Crest, and Lamontville,
ANC members have arrived, backed by the state’s armed forces, to demolish their
members’ homes.
The Municipality in
Durban, like others around the country, has a long history of sending in armed
men to disconnect people from water and electricity and evict them from their
homes. These actions are routinely unlawful. In April last year, after a series
of evictions carried out in Durban in violation of both the law and court
orders, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute declared that eThekwini
Municipality had gone ‘rogue’. These actions are also
often extraordinarily violent. In October last year two residents of a shack
settlement in the suburb of Reservoir Hills were killed, and another seven
injured, during an armed electricity disconnection.
But it’s one thing for a state to act unlawfully and violently. It’s another thing for a state to encourage members of the ruling party to attack people organised outside of the party. For anyone who lived through the civil war that wreaked so much destruction across what is now KwaZulu-Natal in the last years of apartheid, or grew up in its aftermath, this shift to the mobilisation of horizontal violence against grassroots activists is all too familiar. In the late 1980s the apartheid state, confronting a growing urban rebellion, and finding the legitimacy of its own capacity to exercise violence under sustained critique, armed and supported the Inkatha to attack anti-apartheid forces.
But it’s one thing for a state to act unlawfully and violently. It’s another thing for a state to encourage members of the ruling party to attack people organised outside of the party. For anyone who lived through the civil war that wreaked so much destruction across what is now KwaZulu-Natal in the last years of apartheid, or grew up in its aftermath, this shift to the mobilisation of horizontal violence against grassroots activists is all too familiar. In the late 1980s the apartheid state, confronting a growing urban rebellion, and finding the legitimacy of its own capacity to exercise violence under sustained critique, armed and supported the Inkatha to attack anti-apartheid forces.
A good number of the
people who have ascended to power in the ANC in KwaZulu-Natal cut their
political teeth in the resulting civil war. Some, like John Mchunu, who was the
chairperson of the ANC in Durban from 2008 till his death in 2010, had been
with Inkatha during the war. After his death the Mail & Guardian described
Mchunu as having been an Inkatha “warlord” in the 1980s and, as head of the ANC
in Durban, as a “Chicago-mob kind of character, establishing a system of
economic and political patronage in local politics”.
Ruling party ‘hegemony’
It is, in the main, in
defence of this system of economic and political patronage that assassination
is becoming an increasingly common part of political life in Durban and the
province of KwaZulu-Natal. But with popular protest having escalated over the
last decade to the point where dramatic images of protestors confronting an
increasingly militarised police force from behind burning barricades are a
regular feature of the evening news, there is also a growing sense that the ruling
party’s long hegemony is under real threat.
Land occupations, road
blockades and, when it is effective, resistance to housing projects understood
to have been subordinated to the political and pecuniary interests of local
party structures, strike real blows at the party’s capacity to monopolise the
exercise of certain forms of power.
Numsa and the Economic
Freedom Fighters (EFF) are both making serious attempts to capture the
discontent that is animating the popular ferment rolling through our cities.
Numsa’s strength lies in the fact that it is rooted in a union that has real
organisational strength.
But, at the moment, it’s
stolid discourse and rather flat footed response to an escalating social and
political crisis doesn’t bode particularly well for aspirations to make
significant political interventions beyond the shop floor. It is the EFF that
have, with a real gift for the politics of spectacle, stormed the media and
begun to position themselves as a serious rival to the ANC.
The EFF has certainly
captured much of the political space in Marikana. But Marikana has become
bigger than the miner’s struggle that turned the name of a place into the name
of an event. In Durban and in Cape Town tenacious struggles are being waged
over land occupations named for Marikana.
But despite all the
contestation on the part of new entrants into the sphere of elite politics
aiming to capture the political energies being organised from below neither of
the chief contenders have, thus far, really connected with the issues,
sentiments and organisations driving actually existing forms of popular
politics in our cities. A politics organised for socialism or against white
monopoly capital and for the restoration of rural land remains at some remove
from the immediate urgencies of the urban land occupation.
In Durban Abahlali
baseMjondolo has been more effective than any other organisation in winning the
support of people engaged in struggles for urban land and housing and against
forms of development resulting in dispossession or mediated through systems of
patronage organised through the ruling party. In Cape Town it is organisations
like SANCO and Ses’Khona, both directly linked to the ANC, that are at the
forefront of these struggles.
As a result of the
tenacity of their protagonists, and the access that organisations like Abahlali
baseMjondolo and Ses’Khona have won in the elite public sphere, these struggles
are slowly seeping into a wider national political consciousness. But in
general the middle classes haven’t shown much interest in assassinations or
murders that take the lives of poor black people in places where the middle
classes, white and black, fear to tread. They should take heed of Aimé
Césaire’s observation, made in 1955, that colonialism has a ‘boomerang effect’
– that what is done over there, to them, will eventually be done here, to us,
at home.